Following years of inconsistent policies from preceding administrations, Keir Starmer’s Labour Party has affirmed their stance in the UK. will prohibit the sale of new gasoline and diesel vehicles starting in 2030. as promised in its platform.
The relocation has sparked renewed discussion among Independent Readers, with numerous people doubting if Britain is genuinely prepared for this change.
Although many appreciate the environmental goals, most people expressed worries regarding inadequate infrastructure, particularly for individuals lacking driveways or easy access to charging stations. Some contended that without significant financial commitment and better planning, this policy could exacerbate social disparities and undermine public confidence.
Calls were made for a more equitable strategy that includes rewards for electric vehicle owners rather than focusing solely on fines for other drivers.
Some were concerned that the ban might have unintended negative consequences without accessible EVs and dependable charging infrastructure for everyone. However, there was also positivity, as some readers highlighted Norway’s achievements through incentives for EV owners along with decreasing prices for pre-owned electric vehicles.
A lot of people concurred that although the shift is essential, it needs to be implemented in a way that is both pragmatic and inclusive. Should the authorities wish for motorists to support this change, they will have to provide more than mere objectives—they'll require genuine solutions.
You can express your opinions about the 2030 gasoline vehicle ban below. It seems like your message might have been cut off. Could you please provide more details so I can assist you effectively?
Unnecessary driving
A significant amount of extraneous driving occurs frequently. Within my countryside locale, during weekends and holidays, local roadways become congested with long queues of motorcycles, 4x4 visitors, trailers, and occasionally vast groups of classic automobiles. It is imperative that we modify our driving behaviors.
Home electric vehicle chargers present a substantial obstacle, though this issue affects fewer rural homes. Urban areas, which often have accessible public transportation systems, see less necessity for personal vehicles. However, advocating for decreased automobile usage, particularly for recreational purposes, can be perceived as an infringement of liberty. Consequently, there’s considerable resistance towards implementing restrictions, despite overlooking the broader implications related to climate change and environmental contamination.
WorkshyFop
Balance
This appears to be a good article. aiming to strike a balance between the automobile sector and environmental concerns.
I concur that it’s incorrect to permit the sale of full hybrids together with PHEVs until 2035. While I understand that full hybrids offer only slight improvements over conventional gasoline cars, perhaps they might have allotted them an additional two or three years instead of the complete five-year period?
DaveC67
Investment in infrastructure is required for this ban.
The prohibition will not be effective without significant governmental funding for the necessary infrastructure. Since I reside in an apartment, there isn’t any space available for charging an electric car – assuming I had the means to purchase one.
Given their cost, I'm not going to leave it in the local supermarket to charge! And not enough charging points on my 400-mile round trip to see my family.
Sesh70
A madman’s dream
The 2030 gasoline ban is like something out of a madman's dreams; the expenses required just to upgrade our infrastructure would be enough to devastate this nation for centuries.
I’m fed up with politicians who lack practical knowledge and experience crafting unrealistic agendas. Such approaches could potentially devastate our nation. By 2030, mark my words, we’ll desperately seek permission from other nations to continue importing gasoline-powered cars.
Trex
The world is changing
The charging infrastructure lags behind and is overly priced; nonetheless, renewable sources generated more energy than fossil fuels did in 2024, aiming for a fifty percent share this year as oil and gas usage decreases. As time progresses, you might find yourself on a bustling urban thoroughfare filled with halted vehicles, yet you’ll have the chance to inhale deeply, feeling akin to being out in serene rural landscapes.
DitchFirstPastThePost
Nowhere to charge
Sure, it’s straightforward. Those who make the decisions live in five-bedroom homes paid for by taxpayers. These houses come with four-car garages and driveways equipped with electric gates.
Typically, average folks don’t — actually, one out of every two homes nationwide doesn’t even feature a driveway.
Therefore, there are no charging stations available for these vehicles, and there isn’t extra power to charge them either... instructing everybody to avoid driving on chilly days during the winter energy crisis wouldn’t be practical... halting economic activity throughout the season simply isn’t feasible.
BlueWhale
Inconsistency is staggering
Reality is likely to arrive faster than anticipated, driven simply by standard market dynamics.
Where we (still) need some push – and probably public subsidy – is improving infrastructure, and especially charging facilities for people without front drives. Various local councils e.g. Manchester, are still Not permitting individuals to lay cables along a sidewalk, despite this being recognized as a safe practice (some local governments even pay others to carry out such tasks!). For example, consider the Gul-E product. This disparity is quite remarkable.
The Norwegian approach serves as a valuable example. By offering numerous incentives to electric vehicle (EV) owners—such as complimentary parking and unrestricted access to bus and taxi lanes—they successfully promoted adoption. As a result, EVs currently account for 98 percent of new car purchases. Importantly, this shift occurred without mandating the prohibition of internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. Owning an ICE car has simply become obsolete.
SteveHill
Labour running amok
What’s going on here? It seems like labour is getting out of control! Is he bringing back the 2030 ban? I can hardly believe this. Let’s hope these folks are gone before that happens.
The term 'bold' appears to have taken on a new connotation: describing a quadrupedal creature known for its braying.
Krispad
Second cars
For a secondary vehicle, an electric car works well nowadays; older models with over 50 miles of range can be quite affordable, plus their batteries remain reliable enough for that distance.
Yes, as an initial vehicle with extended driving capability, electric cars can be pricey, whereas plug-in hybrids offer a more affordable option. Particularly, you might find cheaper models from previous years which also require less upkeep because of reduced strain on the transmission and braking systems.
Evening electricity rates can reduce your charging expenses to roughly one-third of what you'd pay during peak hours at home. While rapid chargers may set you back around £1000 once installation costs are included, an additional outdoor three-pronged outlet for slower residential charging typically runs approximately £200 and generally meets the needs of most individuals quite adequately.
Hi5
Carrot and stick
There needs to be an approach combining incentives and penalties; electric vehicles ought to incur some level of road tax, with heavier emissions resulting in higher charges.
Vlossy
To condense this article, some remarks have been modified for succinctness and clear understanding.
If you wish to express your opinions, just fill out the form with your information below. After registering, you'll have the opportunity to leave comments on today's leading news stories for a possibility of being highlighted. If you prefer, tap 'Log In' or 'Register' at the upper-right corner to either log into your account or create one.
Ensure compliance with our guidelines. community guidelines , which you can find here For comprehensive instructions on how to leave comments click here.
The Independent has consistently maintained a worldwide viewpoint. Rooted in strong foundations of exceptional international coverage and analysis, The Independent now boasts a scope that would have been unimaginable upon its launch as a new entrant in the UK media landscape. In this era, for the first time since the conclusion of the Second World War, these core principles—pluralism, rationality, progressivism, humanism, and international outlook—are facing challenges globally. Despite these threats, The Independent continues to expand.